Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Check your email for a verification code and enter it below.Don't close this box or you must fill out this form again.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Sex Ed teacher gets around no condom demo law
It's interesting to me that the same people who are anti-contraceptive (and against sex-education or availability of contraceptives) are also the same people who are anti-abortion.
How do they not see the correlation between unwanted pregnancy and abortion? And yet, they don't want any more "welfare moms" either? /confused.
newtboy (Member Profile)
Congrats. You've made a new friend.
I don't think it's legal to use force (which is what a traffic stop is) to have a nice interaction. Even if you're handing out money, it is not proper. But then I believe in the 4th amendment.
Deano (Member Profile)
Thank you very much for the power point!
Why People Doubt Climate Science, And Why Facts Don't Matter
And here's you just plagiarizing what someone else said again.
http://i.imgur.com/qZRwdbv.jpg
Really starting to wonder if you're even capable of an original thought.
And here's a prominent scientist's critique of the IPCC. It provides a good rebuttal to those who imagine that the only critics are ignorant and/or venal people who believe in a vast conspiracy of climate scientists.
How To Properly Wrap A Gift
Yeah. That was great. My favorite part was when he threw out the backing from the bow adhesive. Awesome.
The Newsroom's Take On Global Warming-Fact Checked
Did you fall down the stairs and hit your head? Are you OK?
I hope so. Though a concussion is really the only explanation for the nonsense you just wrote. Maybe you should get that checked.
Like most of Sorkin's bloviating, this empty rhetoric is undermined by the incongruency of the climate change alarmists' own ballooning carbon footprints while attempting to use the government to impose force upon others' behavior. Until global warming alarmists themselves walk their talk (i.e., drive hybrids -- if they drive at all -- cease flying in airplanes, eat strictly vegetarian diets, have few if any children, and withdraw their consent from the worst polluter on the planet: the state), then no amount of freaking out, ranting, incentives, or attempts at policy will serve to avert the "impending catastrophe."
In China and India (where pollution is no doubt a significant problem), there are hundreds of millions of people who have far bigger concerns and more pressing problems than some remote notion of a "warming planet" or some looming "catastrophic collapse of civilization." (In fact, the same can be said for the majority of the population of the planet.)
And this is to say nothing of how ALL of the models used to support "evidence" for the case of a warming planet have ALL (not some, but ALL) been consistently undermined by serious skeptical science (PDF) while the claims of the political entity of the IPCC remain inconsistent with the data.
Since when do politicians get to decide the veracity of scientific fact?
EDIT: ALL of the climate-change alarmists' predictions, dating back to the 1980s, have all failed to come true. When this trend continues for the next few decades, there will be no shortage of "Told You So" moments that will undoubtedly be explained away by some unknown variable -- like the heat that is "hiding" in the ocean -- that, once "corrected for," will serve to further prop up this political ruse.
The precision repair of a wooden boat
Great editing.
What Does Sound Look Like?-Schlieren Optics
I just want to show this to all those gross people who don't cover their mouth when coughing.
Make Video Website
Could We Actually Live On Mars?
This is a very "limited" presentation on this topic. The only reason we aren't on Mars right now is (surprise!) money.
Would you like to know more?
A few points to consider:
Total cost of the USA war in Iraq:
"NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. war in Iraq has cost $1.7 trillion with an additional $490 billion in benefits owed to war veterans, expenses that could grow to more than $6 trillion over the next four decades counting interest, a study released on Thursday said."
TOTAL cost of NASA's budget over the last 50 years since its inception and adjusted for inflation:
$790 billion
marinara (Member Profile)
Happy birthday marinara! I was just going to offer folly on how remiss we have been to catch up a spell, but then I realized I shouldn't talk like I just time traveled from the 18th century.
newtboy (Member Profile)
Thank you again!
OH THE FUCKING HUMANITY!!!!
*promote the fuck out of this shite!
newtboy (Member Profile)
Thank you!
Again....*promote
Jerry Seinfeld Thinks He Has Autism
...
newtboy (Member Profile)
Have you looked at that YT channel?
It's like Sarah Palin took a shit in Alex Jones' mouth and somehow that made a baby.
Ahhh...I see. Nevermind! :-)
OK, tragic waste, yep. Let's hope the late delivery won't be tragic though, just inconvenient.